Friday, July 10, 2015

95 Thesis

 

Luther's Ninety-Five Theses Nailed to the Wittenberg Church's Door
Since your most serene majesty and your highnesses require of me a simple, clear, and direct answer, I will give one, and it is this: I cannot submit my faith either to the pope or to the council, because it is clear that they have fallen into error and even into inconsistency with themselves. If, then, I am not convinced by proof from Holy Scripture, or by cogent reasons, if I am not satisfied by the very text I have cited, and if my judgment is not in this way brought into subjection to God's word, I neither can nor will retract anything; for it cannot be either safe or honest for a Christian to speak against his conscience. Here I stand. I cannot do otherwise. God help me. Amen.

Luther's 97 theses on the topic of scholastic theology had been posted only a month before his 95 theses focusing on the sale of indulgences. Both writs were only intended to invite discussion of the topic. Martin Luther (l. 1483-1546) objected to scholastic theology on the grounds that it could not reveal the truth of God and denounced indulgences – writs sold by the Church to shorten one's stay (or a loved one's) in purgatory – as unbiblical and avaricious.

he 95 Theses represented a direct challenge to the authority of the Church from a respected clergyman.

The 95 Theses became the catalyst for reformation because they were soon after translated from Latin into German and, thanks to the technology of the printing press, were made available to the public. Within a year of the initial distribution of the theses, they had already been translated into other languages and ignited the Reformation movement in other countries because, to those who read them or heard them read, they represented a direct challenge to the authority of the Church from a respected clergyman in good standing.

The following are the 95 Theses in English published through the website Reasonable Theology from the translation by Adolph Spaeth, et. al. as they appear in Works of Martin Luther. The text is given below without commentary and slight changes in phrasing and punctuation for clarity.

The 95 Theses

Out of love for the truth and the desire to bring it to light, the following propositions will be discussed at Wittenberg, under the presidency of the Reverend Father Martin Luther, Master of Arts and of Sacred Theology, and Lecturer in Ordinary on the same at that place. Wherefore he requests that those who are unable to be present and debate orally with us, may do so by letter.

In the Name our Lord Jesus Christ. Amen.

1. Our Lord and Master Jesus Christ, when He said "Repent", willed that the whole life of believers should be repentance.

In the first Thesis Luther says, "When our Lord and Master Jesus Christ said 'repent' He intended that the entire life of believers should be repentance." Now after Luther wrote the 95 Theses, he also wrote a document called "Explanation of the 95 Theses," and in that text he explains that this word "repent" in the Latin Vulgate was translated as paenitentiam agite, which means, translated, as "Go, and do penance."
The year before 1517, in 1516, Erasmus published the Greek text and Luther had a copy of that Greek text. And he saw that the Greek word for repentance, metanoia, is not even close to the idea of paenitentiam agite. So this return to Scripture had an immediate impact on the very first of Luther's 95 Theses. 

2. This word cannot be understood to mean sacramental penance, i.e. confession and satisfaction, which is administered by the priests.

3. Yet it means not inward repentance only; nay, there is no inward repentance which does not outwardly work diverse mortifications of the flesh.

4. The penalty [of sin], therefore, continues so long as hatred of self continues; for this is the true inward repentance, and continues until our entrance into the kingdom of heaven.

5. The pope does not intend to remit and cannot remit any penalties other than those which he has imposed either by his own authority or by that of the Canons.

6. The pope cannot remit any guilt, except by declaring that it has been remitted by God and by assenting to God's remission; though, to be sure, he may grant remission in cases reserved to his judgment. If his right to grant remission in such cases were despised, the guilt would remain entirely unforgiven.

7. God remits guilt to no one whom He does not, at the same time, humble in all things and bring into subjection to His vicar, the priest, in 1517.

8. The penitential canons are imposed only on the living, and, according to them, nothing should be imposed on the dying.

9. Therefore the Holy Spirit in the pope is kind to us, because in his decrees he always makes exception of the article of death and of necessity.

10. Ignorant and wicked are the doings of those priests who, in the case of the dying, reserve canonical penances for purgatory.

11. This changing of the canonical penalty to the penalty of purgatory is quite evidently one of the tares that were sown while the bishops slept.

12. In former times the canonical penalties were imposed not after, but before absolution, as tests of true contrition.

13. The dying are freed by death from all penalties; they are already dead to canonical rules and have a right to be released from them.

14. The imperfect health [of soul], that is to say, the imperfect love, of the dying brings with it, of necessity, great fear; and the smaller the love, the greater is the fear.

15. This fear and horror is sufficient of itself alone (to say nothing of other things) to constitute the penalty of purgatory, since it is very near to the horror of despair.

16. Hell, purgatory, and heaven seem to differ as do despair, almost-despair, and the assurance of safety.

17. With souls in purgatory it seems necessary that horror should grow less and love increase.

18. It seems unproved, either by reason or Scripture, that they are outside the state of merit, that is to say, of increasing love.

19. Again, it seems unproved that they, or at least that all of them, are certain or assured of their own blessedness, though we may be quite certain of it.

20. Therefore by "full remission of all penalties" the pope means not actually "of all," but only of those imposed by himself.

21. Therefore those preachers of indulgences are in error, who say that by the pope's indulgences a man is freed from every penalty and saved.

22. Whereas he remits to souls in purgatory no penalty which, according to the canons, they would have had to pay in this life.

23. If it is at all possible to grant to any one the remission of all penalties whatsoever, it is certain that this remission can be granted only to the most perfect, that is, to the very fewest.

24. It must needs be, therefore, that the greater part of the people are deceived by that indiscriminate and high-sounding promise of release from penalty.

25. The power which the pope has, in a general way, over purgatory, is just like the power which any bishop or curate has, in a special way, within his own diocese or parish.

26. The pope does well when he grants remission to souls [in purgatory], not by the power of the keys (which he does not possess), but by way of intercession.

27. They preach man who say that so soon as the penny jingles into the money-box, the soul flies out [of purgatory].

Our second in the Top 5 is number 27. Now we need a little background for this one as well. In Thesis number 27, Luther says, "They preach man made doctrines who say that it's so soon as the coin jingles into the money box, the soul flies out of purgatory." Now this is a reference to Tetzel. Tetzel was an enterprising monk who was selling indulgences, and he even came up with an advertising jingle, and in German it had a rhyme to it. The jingle went something like this:

As soon as the money in the chest rings, a soul from purgatory springs.

And in German, "rings," the word Tetzel used, was klingt, and for "springs," the German word is springt. So Luther is picking up on that to say this is a man made doctrine. 

28. It is certain that when the penny jingles into the money-box, gain and avarice can be increased, but the result of the intercession of the Church is in the power of God alone.

29. Who knows whether all the souls in purgatory wish to be bought out of it, as in the legend of Saints Severinus and Paschal.

30. No one is sure that his own contrition is sincere; much less that he has attained full remission.

31. Rare as is the man that is truly penitent, so rare is also the man who truly buys indulgences, i.e. such men are most rare.

32. They will be condemned eternally, together with their teachers, who believe themselves sure of their salvation because they have letters of pardon.

33. Men must be on their guard against those who say that the pope's pardons are that inestimable gift of God by which man is reconciled to Him.

34. For these "graces of pardon" concern only the penalties of sacramental satisfaction, and these are appointed by man.

35. They preach no Christian doctrine who teach that contrition is not necessary in those who intend to buy souls out of purgatory or to buy confessional.

36. Every truly repentant Christian has a right to full remission of penalty and guilt, even without letters of pardon.

37. Every true Christian, whether living or dead, has part in all the blessings of Christ and the Church; and this is granted him by God, even without letters of pardon.

38. Nevertheless, the remission and participation [in the blessings of the Church] which are granted by the pope are in no way to be despised, for they are, as I have said, the declaration of divine remission.

39. It is most difficult, even for the very keenest theologians, at one and the same time to commend to the people the abundance of pardons and [the need of] true contrition.

40. True contrition seeks and loves penalties, but liberal pardons only relax penalties and cause them to be hated, or at least, furnish an occasion [for hating them].

41. Apostolic pardons are to be preached with caution, lest the people may falsely think them preferable to other good works of love.

42. Christians are to be taught that the pope does not intend the buying of pardons to be compared in any way to works of mercy.

43. Christians are to be taught that he who gives to the poor or lends to the needy does a better work than buying pardons.

44. Because love grows by works of love, and man becomes better; but by pardons man does not grow better, only more free from penalty.

45. Christians are to be taught that he who sees a man in need, and passes him by, and gives [his money] for pardons, purchases not the indulgences of the pope, but the indignation of God.

46. Christians are to be taught that unless they have more than they need, they are bound to keep back what is necessary for their own families, and by no means to squander it on pardons.

47. Christians are to be taught that the buying of pardons is a matter of free will, and not of commandment.

48. Christians are to be taught that the pope, in granting pardons, needs, and therefore desires, their devout prayer for him more than the money they bring.

49. Christians are to be taught that the pope's pardons are useful, if they do not put their trust in them; but altogether harmful, if through them they lose their fear of God.

50. Christians are to be taught that if the pope knew the exactions of the pardon-preachers, he would rather that St. Peter's church should go to ashes, than that it should be built up with the skin, flesh, and bones of his sheep.

Our third in our Top 5 list is number 50. In Thesis 50 Luther says, "Christians are to be taught that if the pope knew the exactions of the indulgence-preachers he would rather that St. Peter's church should go to ashes than that it should be built up with the skin, flesh, and bones of his sheep." Now we're getting to the real reason behind Tetzel's indulgence sale. The purpose of the indulgence sale was to raise money for the church. And the church needed the money because Pope Leo X back in Rome was literally bankrupting the church by building St. Peter's Basilica. This is the time of Michelangelo; this is the painting of the Sistine Chapel. And Michelangelo is not a cheap ceiling painter. So, the church needed to get money from somewhere, and out went Tetzel. And Luther saw right through this, and he said, "This is coming on the backs of the poor German peasants." 

51. Christians are to be taught that it would be the pope's wish, as it is his duty, to give of his own money to very many of those from whom certain hawkers of pardons cajole money, even though the church of St. Peter might have to be sold.

52. The assurance of salvation by letters of pardon is vain, even though the commissary, nay, even though the pope himself, were to stake his soul upon it.

53. They are enemies of Christ and of the pope, who bid the Word of God be altogether silent in some Churches, in order that pardons may be preached in others.

54. Injury is done the Word of God when, in the same sermon, an equal or a longer time is spent on pardons than on this Word.

55. It must be the intention of the pope that if pardons, which are a very small thing, are celebrated with one bell, with single processions and ceremonies, then the Gospel, which is the very greatest thing, should be preached with a hundred bells, a hundred processions, a hundred ceremonies.

56. The "treasures of the Church," out of which the pope grants indulgences, are not sufficiently named or known among the people of Christ.

57. That they are not temporal treasures is certainly evident, for many of the vendors do not pour out such treasures so easily, but only gather them.

58. Nor are they the merits of Christ and the Saints, for even without the pope, these always work grace for the inner man, and the cross, death, and hell for the outward man.

59. St. Lawrence said that the treasures of the Church were the Church's poor, but he spoke according to the usage of the word in his own time.

60. Without rashness we say that the keys of the Church, given by Christ's merit, are that treasure.

61. For it is clear that, for the remission of penalties and of reserved cases, the power of the pope is of itself sufficient.

62. The true treasure of the Church is the Most Holy Gospel of the glory and the grace of God.

Our fourth is number 62. And number 62 doesn't need any exposition. I'll just plainly state it. Luther says this: "The true treasure of the church is the most holy gospel of the glory and grace of God." 

63. But this treasure is naturally most odious, for it makes the first to be last.

64. On the other hand, the treasure of indulgences is naturally most acceptable, for it makes the last to be first.

65. Therefore the treasures of the Gospel are nets with which they formerly were wont to fish for men of riches.

66. The treasures of the indulgences are nets with which they now fish for the riches of men.

67. The indulgences which the preachers cry as the "greatest graces" are known to be truly such, in so far as they promote gain.

68. Yet they are in truth the very smallest graces compared with the grace of God and the piety of the Cross.

69. Bishops and curates are bound to admit the commissaries of apostolic pardons, with all reverence.

70. But still more are they bound to strain all their eyes and attend with all their ears, lest these men preach their own dreams instead of the commission of the pope.

71. He who speaks against the truth of apostolic pardons, let him be anathema and accursed!

72. But he who guards against the lust and license of the pardon-preachers, let him be blessed!

73. The pope justly thunders against those who, by any art, contrive the injury of the traffic in pardons.

74. But much more does he intend to thunder against those who use the pretext of pardons to contrive the injury of holy love and truth.

75. To think the papal pardons so great that they could absolve a man even if he had committed an impossible sin and violated the Mother of God – this is madness.

76. We say, on the contrary, that the papal pardons are not able to remove the very least of venial sins, so far as its guilt is concerned.

77. It is said that even St. Peter, if he were now Pope, could not bestow greater graces; this is blasphemy against St. Peter and against the pope.

78. We say, on the contrary, that even the present pope, and any pope at all, has greater graces at his disposal; to wit, the Gospel, powers, gifts of healing, etc., as it is written in I Corinthians 12.

79. To say that the cross, emblazoned with the papal arms, which is set up [by the preachers of indulgences], is of equal worth with the Cross of Christ, is blasphemy.

80. The bishops, curates, and theologians who allow such talk to be spread among the people, will have an account to render.

81. This unbridled preaching of pardons makes it no easy matter, even for learned men, to rescue the reverence due to the pope from slander, or even from the shrewd questionings of the laity.

82. To wit: – "Why does not the pope empty purgatory, for the sake of holy love and of the dire need of the souls that are there, if he redeems an infinite number of souls for the sake of miserable money with which to build a Church? The former reasons would be most just; the latter is most trivial."

83. Again: – "Why are mortuary and anniversary masses for the dead continued, and why does he not return or permit the withdrawal of the endowments founded on their behalf, since it is wrong to pray for the redeemed?"

84. Again: – "What is this new piety of God and the pope, that for money they allow a man who is impious and their enemy to buy out of purgatory the pious soul of a friend of God, and do not rather, because of that pious and beloved soul's own need, free it for pure love's sake?"

85. Again: – "Why are the penitential canons long since in actual fact and through disuse abrogated and dead, now satisfied by the granting of indulgences, as though they were still alive and in force?"

86. Again: – "Why does not the pope, whose wealth is to-day greater than the riches of the richest, build just this one church of St. Peter with his own money, rather than with the money of poor believers?"

87. Again: – "What is it that the pope remits, and what participation does he grant to those who, by perfect contrition, have a right to full remission and participation?"

88. Again: – "What greater blessing could come to the Church than if the pope were to do a hundred times a day what he now does once, and bestow on every believer these remissions and participations?"

89. "Since the pope, by his pardons, seeks the salvation of souls rather than money, why does he suspend the indulgences and pardons granted heretofore, since these have equal efficacy?"

90. To repress these arguments and scruples of the laity by force alone, and not to resolve them by giving reasons, is to expose the Church and the pope to the ridicule of their enemies, and to make Christians unhappy.

91. If, therefore, pardons were preached according to the spirit and mind of the pope, all these doubts would be readily resolved; nay, they would not exist.

92. Away, then, with all those prophets who say to the people of Christ, "Peace, peace," and there is no peace!

93. Blessed be all those prophets who say to the people of Christ, "Cross, cross," and there is no cross!

Well that leaves our last of our Top 5. And for this I'm going to cheat a little bit. I'm going to pull two together. And this is Theses number 92 & 93. "Away then with all those prophets who say to the people of Christ, 'Peace, peace,' and there is no peace. Blessed be all those prophets who say to the people of Christ, 'Cross, cross,' and there is no cross." 

94. Christians are to be exhorted that they be diligent in following Christ, their Head, through penalties, deaths, and hell.

95. And thus be confident of entering into heaven rather through many tribulations, than through the assurance of peace.

Tuesday, July 7, 2015

Job 37 - Where were you

You are asked about the kid who was killed in a bus accident or a kid who was in a car that was cut in half?
How could God allow this to happen? He doesn't seem to be a good God.


How dare you question God!
God can do whatever He wants... He can dish out judgement on the saint and give mercy to the pagan.
In Exodus 33:19  I will have mercy on whom I will show mercy
How blessed we are that we are not snuffed out now, how our nose is closed so as not to breath?

This was God's response to Job's constant questioning of why he is suffering.
God's is challenging Job to acknowledge his own limitations and submit to God's divine power.

Job 38:4-5
“
4Where were you when I laid the foundation of the earth?
    Tell me, if you have understanding.
5 5Who determined its measurements—surely you know!
    Or who stretched the line upon it?

34 
Job 38:34-37

34“Can you lift up your voice to the clouds,

    that a flood of waters may cover you?
35 35Can you send forth lightnings, that they may go
    and say to you, ‘Here we are’?
3636 36Who has put wisdom in the inward parts[c]
    or given understanding to the mind?[d]
3377 37Who can number the clouds by wisdom?

Luke 13:1-5
13 There were some present at that very time who told him about the Galileans whose blood Pilate had
mingled with their sacrifices. 2 And he answered them, “Do you think that these Galileans were worse sinners than all the other Galileans, because they suffered in this way? 3 No, I tell you; but unless you repent, you will all likewise perish. 4 Or those eighteen on whom the tower in Siloam fell and killed them: do you think that they were worse offenders than all the others who lived in Jerusalem? 5 No, I tell you; but unless you repent, you will all likewise perish.”

Romans 8:28
For we know that all things work together for good for those who are called according to His purpose



Thursday, July 2, 2015

Protestant vs Catholicism vs Judaism




Why Evangelical became Catholic (WHI)
One reason was the universal uniqueness of the Catholic liturgy. You can go to a church in Egypt and go to a church in Nebraska and the liturgy is basically the same. There is a formality and safety in uniformity. There are so many Protestant churches with so many different styles of worship. It seems that Protestants are schizophrenic.

Justification by Faith alone

Roman Catholicism believes that at Baptism we ourselves become righteous, as a gift of grace, and that we are justified before God on account of our own righteousness. Because our justification rests at least in part on us, it is therefore not secure nor complete, and thus likely dependent on future works to maintain.

Catholics believe that the sacrament of baptism removes original sin and returns one to a state of innocence, enabling them to perform works of congruous merit.

In relation to the topic of Justification, much of the Catholic understanding was developed and outlined in the official Council of Trent, which served as an authoritative council.
The big idea for Protestants is that all of our salvation is entirely dependent on Christ and Christ alone. Solely by Jesus righteousness imputed to the sinner.

“Infusion” as Catholics believe, means that through Baptism (more on Baptism later), righteousness is not imputed to us, but rather it is infused in us, and we actually become righteous ourselves. It is on that ground, of our own righteousness (what they refer to as the meritorious cause), that we are then justified by God.
“meritorious cause”—the efficient reason why God justifies us

Catholics believe that God “infuses” righteousness into us at Baptism, and that as a result God then justifies us as a result of our righteousness.

The Roman Catholic view is that our Baptism is the point at which grace is “infused” into us, and therefore the point at which we personally become righteous, a righteousness that becomes the “meritorious cause” of our justification. But what happens when throughout a person’s life they prove themselves to be still a sinner, as certainly all are destined to do? Can this “infusion” diminish over time due to our sin? According to Catholic doctrine, yes! A person can fall into patterns of sin that diminish his infused grace. In fact, some sins are so bad that they can cause a person who was once justified, to lose their justification. These sins are called ‘mortal sins.’ The term ‘mortal sin’ is how Catholics refer to sins that are so bad that they may cause a person to lose their state of justification, and therefore lose their salvation.

In cases of Mortal Sin, a person is able to restore themselves through participation in another sacrament, penance.

"[S]o, whoever desires to recover the grace of baptism, forfeited by mortal sins, must have recourse to another means of expiation, namely the sacrament of penance." (Catechism of the Council of Trent. Chapter XI. Question IX).

Yes, the Catholic Church teaches that God desires all people to be saved and to come to know the truth about Christ Jesus. This is stated in the Catechism of the Catholic Church, which says that God "desires all men to be saved and to come to the knowledge of the truth". The Catholic Church also teaches that salvation is possible for those who do not explicitly believe in Christ.

The Catholic Church also prays that no one should be lost. Some say that Christians can express love and mercy by desiring and praying for everyone to be saved, even though they know that not everyone will be saved.
CATECHISM OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH
SECOND EDITION

851 Missionary motivation. It is from God's love for all men that the Church in every age receives both the obligation and the vigor of her missionary dynamism, "for the love of Christ urges us on."343 Indeed, God "desires all men to be saved and to come to the knowledge of the truth";344 that is, God wills the salvation of everyone through the knowledge of the truth. Salvation is found in the truth. Those who obey the prompting of the Spirit of truth are already on the way of salvation. But the Church, to whom this truth has been entrusted, must go out to meet their desire, so as to bring them the truth. Because she believes in God's universal plan of salvation, the Church must be missionary.

They believe that those who die with unconfessed sin will go through a fiery trial after death (like Purgatory).

Invincible Ignorance
Invincible ignorance is a theological concept, primarily Catholic, describing a lack of knowledge about a moral law or religious truth that is truly unavoidable, meaning the person isn't culpable (blameworthy) for their error, such as someone never hearing the Gospel or being raised in a culture where a truth is unknown. It's the opposite of vincible ignorance, where someone could know better but fails to seek the truth, making them responsible for their actions. This concept helps explain how people outside the Church or unfamiliar with its teachings can still be judged fairly by God, who considers sincere hearts seeking good. 
Key Aspects

Not Fault-Based: The ignorance is "invincible" because it's impossible for the person to overcome it, not because they don't want to.
Examples: Pagans, infants, or people in isolated communities who have never had a chance to hear the Christian message are often cited as examples.
Divine Judgment: God judges people based on the knowledge they have or should have sought, not what they couldn't possibly know, as seen in the parable of the talents (Luke 12:48).
Contrast with Vincible Ignorance: A person acting in vincible ignorance knows they lack knowledge but fails to investigate further (e.g., refusing to learn something they know they should).
Historical Roots: The idea dates back to early Church thinkers like Origen and Aquinas, later formalized by popes like Pius IX. 

Why it Matters (Theological Significance)
It addresses the "extra ecclesiam nulla salus" ("outside the Church there is no salvation") teaching, explaining how sincere people outside the Church can still attain salvation.
It emphasizes God's justice and mercy, ensuring people aren't condemned for ignorance they couldn't help. 
Perfect Contrition
In the Catholic Church, perfect contrition is a way to repent for sins without confessing to a priest. It involves:

Repenting for sins: Detesting past sins, grieving over them, and resolving not to commit them again

Loving God: Repenting because of a love for God and a desire to avoid offending him

Intending to confess: Making a firm commitment to confess as soon as possible

Perfect contrition can remove the guilt and eternal punishment for mortal sins, even before confession. It can be especially important in situations where confession is not possible, such as in the case of imminent death.

Here are some steps for making an act of perfect contrition:
Ask for perfect contrition: Ask God for perfect contrition for all sins
Kneel: Kneel at the foot of a crucifix and remember how Jesus suffered for you
Repent: Repent for sins and promise to not sin again with God's help
Recite: Recite an act of contrition that focuses on God's goodness and love for Jesus


There is no set formula for making an act of contrition, but a common one includes: "My God, I am sorry for my sins with all my heart".
Catholic teaching defines perfect contrition in the Council of Trent, Session XIV, ch. iv de Contritione.

Purgatory
The Second Council of Lyon in 1274 formally declared the doctrine of purgatory, defining it as a place of purification for souls on their way to paradise, and that souls benefit from the prayers and pious duties of the living.

Here's a more detailed explanation:
Formalization of Purgatory:
While the concept of purgatory existed in the early Church, the Second Council of Lyon in 1274 provided the first formal definition of it as a place of purification for souls after death.

Purpose of Purgatory:
The council taught that souls who die in God's grace but are not yet perfectly purified need to undergo a process of purification in purgatory before entering heaven.

Benefit of Prayers and Good Works:
The council also stated that the souls in purgatory can benefit from the prayers and good works of the living, such as masses and alms, which can help to shorten their time in purgatory.

“And it is not impossible that something of the same kind may take place even after this life. It is a matter that may be inquired into, and either ascertained or left doubtful, whether some believers shall pass through a kind of purgatorial fire, and in proportion as they have loved with more or less devotion the goods that perish, be less or more quickly delivered from it. This cannot, however, be the case of any of those of whom it is said, that they ‘shall not inherit the kingdom of God,’ unless after suitable repentance their sins be forgiven them. When I say ‘suitable,’ I mean that they are not to be unfruitful in almsgiving; for Holy Scripture lays so much stress on this virtue, that our Lord tells us beforehand, that He will ascribe no merit to those on His right hand but that they abound in it, and no defect to those on His left hand but their want of it, when He shall say to the former, “Come, ye blessed of my Father, inherit the kingdom,” and to the latter, ‘Depart from me, ye cursed, into everlasting fire.'”

Saint Augustine, Enchiridion, 69

Immaculate Conception

Finally in 1854, with the Bull Ineffabilis, Pius IX solemnly proclaimed the dogma of the Immaculate Conception: "... We declare, pronounce and define that the doctrine which asserts that the Blessed Virgin Mary, from the first moment of her conception, by a singular grace and privilege of almighty God, and in view of the merits of Jesus Christ, Saviour of the human race, was preserved free from every stain of original sin is a doctrine revealed by God and, for this reason, must be firmly and constantly believed by all the faithful" (DS 2803).

2. The proclamation of the dogma of the Immaculate Conception expresses the essential datum of faith. Pope Alexander VII, in the Bull Sollicitudo of 1661, spoke of the preservation of Mary's soul "in its creation and infusion into the body" (DS 2017). Pius IX's definition, however, prescinds from all explanations about how the soul is infused into the body and attributes to the person of Mary, at the first moment of her conception, the fact of her being preserved from every stain of original sin.
Council of Trent - Justification by Faith Alone
CANON IX.-If any one saith, that by faith alone the impious is justified; in such wise as to mean, that nothing else is required to co-operate in order to the obtaining the grace of Justification, and that it is not in any way necessary, that he be prepared and disposed by the movement of his own will; let him be
 anathema.


Jewish concept of original sin
We have a made in divine image. There are two distinct forces that are at war with each other.
The divine soul and the animal soul. There is evil in us and in the world but we can fight it
with the divine image within us. It's a struggle be have the power within us to overcome it.

Do Jews believe in reincarnation or heaven?
It is possible for an Orthodox Jew to believe that the souls of the righteous dead go to a place similar to the Christian heaven, or that they are reincarnated through many lifetimes, or that they simply wait until the coming of the messiah, when they will be resurrected.

Saturday, June 27, 2015

Portfolio1 - 47Brighton Terrace

Growing up in the Philippines and then moving to a new country, much less America, was fraught with fear and anxiety for a young kid.  But our family home at 47 Brighton Terrace soothed and allayed my fears  as I learned about life, friendship and sports in these united states.  
Brighton Terrace was a short street of row houses that were similar in size and shape and distinct only by color. The street was on a hill and my house stood towards the bottom. It was a nondescript  gray and white skinny duplex with large living room windows that faced the street.   The dining room flowed from the living room and right across was the kitchen which was separated by a window wall where food and conversations were often passed.  The bedrooms were in the back and mine was in the left side corner with two windows with a backyard view.
There was a finished basement with a full kitchen and bathroom where many a day and night were spent hanging out with friends.   The lot was rectangular with a sloping side and backyard  and during winter provided a great sled track.  The home was important because of its location.  Kids around the neighborhood would gathering in front of my house and play.  Even as I was doing my chores or practicing the piano, the constant sqwauking and giggling of kids playing, made me feel like a caged bird needing to escape, which left the chores halfheartedly done and the piano practice cursory.  The house also served as a meeting point where we assembled to plan our next sports activity.
 What I cherish most about the home was how it brought me many friends where true, deep relationships were forged with  no self-pride, pretenses or racial bias.  We were all from different cultures but holding no notions of self importance.  Mike and Anthony,  brothers three years apart,  were kids of Italian immigrants and my constant playmates.  Their father was hilarious as he told stories about life in Italy, with his thick Scicillian accent, which I found hard to understand but  enjoyed nonetheless.  There was  a Chinese kid next door named Henry  who was a bit younger  than most us .  He was a skinny kid, not very athletic but he had one important asset.  He had a 16 year sister who had lots of friends and on hot summer days would wear the skimpiest of bikinis as they lounged around their backyard pool.  My friends and I made spying on them a spectator sport as we looked out my bedroom window hoping not to get caught.    John was another friend who lived on the next block.  He was a Portuguese kid, thickly built with curly black hair, and always a source of comical entertainment, trying hard to fit in but always making a fool of himself.  We loved him! 
Then there was Debra who lived a few houses up and across the street.  She was kind of chubby but had a very pretty exotic face.  Any time her parents were gone, she would always invite me up to here room.  Either I was naive or just plain stupid, but I always refused. I knew in my head and heart that it was probably a bad idea.  Although we  were all  young, there were definitely stirrings of sexual feelings and awareness.   Lisa, short cute and blonde, lived on the next block  and our backyards shared a common chain-linked fence. We would spend hours along the fence with our arms hanging over  talking amid the laundry line of sheets and clothes flapping and fresh linen scent wafting around us.  However, during high school she became a cheerleader and our interests went separate ways and we lamented as we signed each other's yearbook at how we drifted apart when once we were so close.
Mark Ver Sprill who lived up the street and around the corner was my best friend.  We shared a common interest  in sports music and girls.  We were partners in crime in almost everything and leaders in promoting our sports activities.  It seemed that playing sports was in his life's blood and he tranfused that love into me.    
The beauty of living in the east coast was the distinct change of seasons.  As the seasons went, so did our sports activities.  Summer brought baseball.  School was out, which in itself was sheer joy, the sun as beading down relentlessly, days were humid, sweltering and sticky, but you couldn't find a kid inside. 
Fall in Irvington ushered in the vibrant change of colors. Trees displayed the hues and nature's color pallete. Bright  orange was the dominant shade with touches of yellow ochre and copper complected  leaves.   Oak trees, that had not yet received the signal that it's fall, created a deep green canvas background that exposed the brilliant colors.
Fall also brought about football which is inherently dangerous sport where immovable objects collide and bodies get battered and pain was a foregone conclusion.  Tackle football on concrete was the norm  and torn pants, bruised knees and ripped shirts kept moms busy at their sewing machines and merthiolate  at the ready.
Winter arrived with its gray dark days and freezing temperatures stung our little faces and the sport was street hockey, our favorite.  Endless hours of playing didn't make us markedly better but we didn't care.  We were just happy shooting the ball around.  I was the goalie, a position I loved,  because it was the most important defensive on the team.  I fashioned goalie pads out of old foam couch seats but constant use made them tear and shred around my pants.  Blocker pads were made out hard cardboard and duct taped around my forearms.  Masks were optional but black eyes and head contusions warranted them.

Looking back at my life, I know that my days growing up on Brighton Terrace .   I'm not sure that any other place would have been a perfect teacher for preparing me for the life in this country.  There were ranges of emotion that filled my childhood from euphoria of stopping a breakaway or the despondency of seeing a girl you liked going out with another kid, the contentment of sitting on the stoop telling stories that were half truths, lots of lies but always believable.  The house was more the roof or a shelter  from the heat and cold.  As a kid from the Philippines It was the perfect teacher on how life is lived in the United States.   

  

Essay 101 - My childhood

  • German Rivera

    German Rivera English 101 Professor McBride My Childhood Monday June 13, 2015                                                                                 47 Brighton Terrace My life of physical activity and knowledge of the four major sports was initiated in a small suburban town of Irvington, New Jersey.  Irvington was a blue collar town with sprinkles of white-collar families.  Close knit neighborhoods along with lifelong friends were considered traditional. My family's house on 47 Brighton Terrace was a gray, skinny duplex with a large living room window facing the street.  We lived in the first floor. There was a two car garage seemingly too small even for a compact car.  It had a finished basement with a full kitchen and bathroom and this room saw many a night of playing board games or just hanging out.  The lot had a sloping side and back yard  and during winter with two feet of snow, would provide a great sled track.  This non-descript house in a row of houses was important for its location.  Because of the abounding amount of kids that lived on the block, all would usually congregate in front of my house before embarking on our sports adventures. Playing sports of any kind was the glue that held our neighborhood  together.  There was camradeship and sticking up for  your friends.  Each neighborhood fielded a team and we were very competitive and sometimes fights would erupt because of pride and youthful  bravado.  But for the most part, we hung around within our own block most of the time contemplating how to score a goal, to pass the touchdown, to make that soft jumper or to hit that homerun. As summer rolled around, the sport was baseball.  School was out, which in itself was sheer joy, the sun was beading down relentlessly, days were humid, sweltering and sticky, but you couldn't find a kid inside.  Since all the kids were out there as an overabundance of players but we didn't care.  Sometimes we would play 20 fielders to a team. Girls in short shorts would ask to play and our adolescent machismo would kick in and halfheartedly agree, yet it was feast for our male prepubescent minds.  We would play as many games as we could, get dirty, grimy with cuts and bruises on all our extremities but having the time of our lives. As the weather turn cooler and the vibrant fall colors emerged, we put our mitts and bats away and brought out the basketball and football.  Basketball was our least favorite but we had tons of fun emulating our favorite stars like Pete Maravich, Walt Frasier and Julius Erving.  Throwing behind the back passes, shooting from all angles and trying to drive around three defenders was performed daily in our pick-up games.  However, basketball was just a place holder for the two sports to follow. Football is inherently a dangerous sport where immovable objects  collide and bodies get battered and pain was a foregone conclusion.  But the way we played it growing up was downright deadly.  Tackle football on concrete was the norm.  Torn pants and ripped shirts kept moms busy at their sewing machines.  Though football was wonderful , street hockey,  was our favorite. What made street hockey personally special was the fact that it was the first organized sport I participated in.  I use the term organized loosely .  How organized can a group of 14 years old be?  We were organized in terms of time and location, other than that it was free-wheeling.   Each kid had a passion to play and be the best at their positions.  I was the goalie and the most important defensive player on the team.  While others prided themselves on scoring, I thrived on stopping the balls from going into the net.  Yes, hockey along with the three other sports was the interweaving fabric that ran through my childhood.  I came to this country when I was nine years old from the balmy seas of the Philippines.  Almost immediately, I was cast as an outsider and realized that I had to adapt rapidly. The quickest way was playing with the other kids, in any sport.  As I worked and played harder, I started getting a few friends and after awhile I was accepted and treated as one of the gang. That was over 50 years ago.  I think I can still play each sport in mind but physically, probably not.  Last year, my company had a picnic and a bunch of guys were playing basketball.  I joined them and played well enough to compete  and all my coworkers were amazed that an overweight, white haired software engineer was so quick and nimble.  But my glory only lasted only a few minutes as I was red-faced, bent over and felt like I was breathing through a straw.  In those few moments, though,  in those few glorious moments, I was transported back to the basketball hoop at 47 Brighton Terrace shooting soft jumpers and making behind the back passes to my guys.  
    German Rivera
    English 101
    Professor McBride
    My Childhood
    Monday June 13, 2015
                                                                                    47 Brighton Terrace
    My life of physical activity and knowledge of the four major sports was initiated in a small suburban town of Irvington, New Jersey.  Irvington was a blue collar town with sprinkles of white-collar families.  Close knit neighborhoods along with lifelong friends were considered traditional.
    My family's house on 47 Brighton Terrace was a gray, skinny duplex with a large living room window facing the street.  We lived in the first floor. There was a two car garage seemingly too small even for a compact car.  It had a finished basement with a full kitchen and bathroom and this room saw many a night of playing board games or just hanging out.  The lot had a sloping side and back yard  and during winter with two feet of snow, would provide a great sled track.  This non-descript house in a row of houses was important for its location.  Because of the abounding amount of kids that lived on the block, all would usually congregate in front of my house before embarking on our sports adventures.
    Playing sports of any kind was the glue that held our neighborhood  together.  There was camradeship and sticking up for  your friends.  Each neighborhood fielded a team and we were very competitive and sometimes fights would erupt because of pride and youthful  bravado.  But for the most part, we hung around within our own block most of the time contemplating how to score a goal, to pass the touchdown, to make that soft jumper or to hit that homerun.
    As summer rolled around, the sport was baseball.  School was out, which in itself was sheer joy, the sun was beading down relentlessly, days were humid, sweltering and sticky, but you couldn't find a kid inside.  Since all the kids were out there as an overabundance of players but we didn't care.  Sometimes we would play 20 fielders to a team. Girls in short shorts would ask to play and our adolescent machismo would kick in and halfheartedly agree, yet it was feast for our male prepubescent minds.  We would play as many games as we could, get dirty, grimy with cuts and bruises on all our extremities but having the time of our lives.
    As the weather turn cooler and the vibrant fall colors emerged, we put our mitts and bats away and brought out the basketball and football.  Basketball was our least favorite but we had tons of fun emulating our favorite stars like Pete Maravich, Walt Frasier and Julius Erving.  Throwing behind the back passes, shooting from all angles and trying to drive around three defenders was performed daily in our pick-up games.  However, basketball was just a place holder for the two sports to follow.
    Football is inherently a dangerous sport where immovable objects  collide and bodies get battered and pain was a foregone conclusion.  But the way we played it growing up was downright deadly.  Tackle football on concrete was the norm.  Torn pants and ripped shirts kept moms busy at their sewing machines.  Though football was wonderful , street hockey,  was our favorite.
    What made street hockey personally special was the fact that it was the first organized sport I participated in.  I use the term organized loosely .  How organized can a group of 14 years old be?  We were organized in terms of time and location, other than that it was free-wheeling.   Each kid had a passion to play and be the best at their positions.  I was the goalie and the most important defensive player on the team.  While others prided themselves on scoring, I thrived on stopping the balls from going into the net.  Yes, hockey along with the three other sports was the interweaving fabric that ran through my childhood.
     I came to this country when I was nine years old from the balmy seas of the Philippines.  Almost immediately, I was cast as an outsider and realized that I had to adapt rapidly. The quickest way was playing with the other kids, in any sport.  As I worked and played harder, I started getting a few friends and after awhile I was accepted and treated as one of the gang.
    That was over 50 years ago.  I think I can still play each sport in mind but physically, probably not.  Last year, my company had a picnic and a bunch of guys were playing basketball.  I joined them and played well enough to compete  and all my coworkers were amazed that an overweight, white haired software engineer was so quick and nimble.  But my glory only lasted only a few minutes as I was red-faced, bent over and felt like I was breathing through a straw.  In those few moments, though,  in those few glorious moments, I was transported back to the basketball hoop at 47 Brighton Terrace shooting soft jumpers and making behind the back passes to my guys.

Monday, June 22, 2015

English 101 - Essay 4 -Something I know well

What user hasn’t come across a message on their computer screen that says “Error: unable to load file” or “Could not access network” or the highly graphic informative blue screen of death which virtually incapacitates the computer.   In the ever changing world of computers, complex hardware and software  bring a myriad of new and more complicated problems. This is what I know best which fortunately is also what I do for work.  As a software engineer and lab administrator who works exclusively on Windows machines, I constantly have to deal with issues and problems wrought by these seemingly innocent yet powerful systems.

As I begin, let me write that this essay is somewhat technical and my come off as a dry and boring but this is what I’m comfortable in explaining because I deal with it daily.  I don’t sing or dance.  I play the guitar and keyboard at church but by no means and expert.  So I’ll try to make it as much prose as possible but not lose the information I want to convey.  Also, I won’t get specific with name brands or give distinct details on how to fix problems, just merely suggestions.  There are enough resources on the web, from computer-savvy friends and experts from big-box stores to resolve any computer issues.

There is a mosaic of complexity that surround the standard computer but for brevity’s sake I’ll focus on one issue and many users question: Why is my computer running so slow?  This simple question has tentacles that touch many areas of the computer, both software and hardware.

For example, a user notices that the computer has recently been booting up slower, much slower that when it was first bought.   One offender could be TSRs. Terminate and Stay Resident applications are programs that load at boot time but appears stopped to the operating system and yet stays active in memory.  These programs have evolved from the early days of computing and have become more involved in the behind-the-scenes activity of the PC and go unnoticed to the user but hog resources none the less.  The TSRs load device drivers in memory when using peripherals like printers, cameras or scanners so at any point in time these devices are active for use.  If these peripherals are not being used then it would be advisable to disable the TSRs that control them thereby minimizing the wait time for booting up the PC.

Another example of PC sluggishness is user applications that take a long time to launch.  When a word processing program is started the user waits as the hourglass spins for what seems like an hour.  After a trip to the coffee bar the user comes back and the application finally starts.  This slowness could be attributed to the lack of enough memory or RAM (random access memory).  Memory is the second most vital workhorse of the computer (the first is the CPU or central processing unit).   RAM is like a huge playground where data manipulation and calculations are done.  If the amount  of memory is too small to do basic functions, then it resorts to something called disk caching.  If there is not enough memory to complete certain transactions then a portion of hard disk is allocated to accommodate the overflow.  However, read and write speeds to a physical device like a hard drive are markedly slower than reading and writing to RAM.  To minimize disk caching and to improve the overall performance of the PC, then more memory is needed.  But memory can get expensive and the amount of memory can be gated by the operating system or memory slots on the PC itself.

Another culprit of slow processing system is Malware.  Malicious software is general term for software that disrupts or destroys as system.  Some forms of Malware are computer viruses, worms, and spyware.  These software and utility programs can range from the annoying to fatal.  For example, a computer virus can infect the user’s computer and delete important data.  This virus is then replicated to other systems, via the network and before long all systems are corrupted. Recovery from viruses and other forms of Malware can be time-consuming, tedious and expensive so it’s better to safeguard the system from the beginning. There are many sophisticated software and hardware tools available that will guard against Malware like anti-virus programs, anti-spyware software and physical and virtual firewalls to name a few. The web is full of information on these products so the user can make an enlightened decision on how to protect their PC.

Working in a lab environment for the past 10 years has brought me about every kind of challenge, some easy but mostly difficult.  Although most of the problems seem similar there are certain nuances to each that frustrate and baffle.  The sophistication of current computer systems has skyrocketed during my tenure and one has to constantly revise and upgrade their skills and know-how just be viable and keep their job.  My favorite saying in the lab is “one step forward, five steps back” because invariably I tackle a problem that should take five minutes to solve, but a missing disk here, a misplaced password there and a software security team that inspects your every move, the five minute solution turns into a two hours marathon. There is a sense of gratification, though, that gives me pride in beating a seemingly unsolvable problem and as I go home at the end of the day I have the satisfaction of a job well done.
   

Essays read: Affair of the Lips: Why we kiss(112), Why gossip is good for you (121),World Wildlife Fund(128)